Forensic Archives - Confer US

Forensic Psychotherapy

admin — Tue, 04 Jun 2019 18:02:56 +0000

In order to receive a CE certificate for this module you have selected to undertake a multiple choice questionnaire. This will assess how much of the module content you have ‘attended’ and understood. Please answer the questions below and submit. There are 30 questions and a total of 14 hours CE can be attained. We will send your results within 14 days and a Certificate of Attendance will be attached to that email.

Please click here to view / download a PDF overview of the questions below. This will help you make notes and answer the test questions as you review the module content.

Important – Please enter your full name and email address below

Full name:
Email Address:

Questions:

Dr Jamie Bennett
1. Dr Jamie Bennett evaluates the effectiveness of the work at HMP Grendon using the following outcome measures. Which questions do they ask?	Tick any that applyr
a. Does the work reduce prison violence?
b. Does the work increase interest in educational opportunities?
c. Does the work reduce reoffending?

2. Dr Jamie Bennett says that the level of self-harm in prisons is generally 140 incidents per 1000 prisoners. What is the level at HMP Grendon?	Select 1 correct answer
a. 160 incidents per 1000 prisoners
b. Less than 30 incidents per 1000 prisoners
c. Between 46 and 55 incidents per 1000 prisoners

Dr Ronald Doctor
1. In quoting Duncan Cartwright, Dr Ronald Doctor describes a particular use of projective identification. What did Cartwright call this?	Select 1 correct answer
a. Narcissistic endoskeleton
b. Narcissistic exoskeleton
c. Toxic idealization

2. Dr Ronald Doctor says	Select 1 correct answer
a. The story of the crime of murder is nearly always an attack on history and an attack on meaning
b. The committing of murder is nearly always an attack on the mother
c. A murder is nearly always an attack on a split-off and despised aspect the self

Dr Sandra M Grant
1. Dr Sandra Grant says that certain forms of killing are socially sanctioned. Which of the following is not in her list?	Select 1 correct answer
a. Self-defense
b. Crimes of passion
c. Corporate accountability
c. Freedom fighting, terrorizm and war

2. Dr Sandra Grant states that murderousness is acted out when…	Tick any that apply
a. There is a history of trauma: severe abuse, neglect and abandonment
b. defenses such as splitting and dissociation lead to difficulty processing thoughts and feelings
c. The individual experiences an overwhelming sense of omnipotence

Mary Haley
1. Mary Haley says that	Select 1 correct answer
a. International Personal Disorder Examination (IPDE) is never used at HMP Grendon
b. The diagnosis of a personality disorder can be extremely helpful for some people
c. Narcissistic personality disorder is the diagnostic category found most useful for the prisoners at HMP Grendon

2. Mary Haley says the vast majority of prisoners have had violent childhoods. What examples of abuse does she list?	Tick any that apply
a. Being kept in cages
b. Sexual abuse
c. Being made to watch sadistic acts

Professor Brett Kahr
1. Professor Brett Kahr refers to one of Freud’s patients, Ernst Lanzer. What was he otherwise know as?	Select 1 correct answer
a. The Wolf Man
b. Little Hans
c. The Rat Man

2. Professor Brett Kahr says	Select 1 correct answer
a. Each of us has the potentiality to fantasize about murder
b. The psychotherapy patient who fantasizes about murder should be referred to psychiatry
c. Fantasies about murder reflect serious psychopathology

Professor Gill McGauley
1. Professor Gill McGauley gives the following quote: �It is a peculiar feature of the forensic context that what is not remembered is repeated in action� Who said this?	Select 1 correct answer
a. Donald Winnicott
b. Stephen Blumenthall
c. David Bell

2. Gill McGauley refers to “ostensive cues” provided by parent to child (Fonagy 2015). What might these include?	Tick any that apply
a. Mirroring
b. Setting boundaries
c. Baby talk

Anna Motz
1. Anna Motz explains some aspects of perverse behavior in women. She says that “An act of violence … “	Tick any that apply
a. Creates sense of power, comfort and control
b. Is a sign of degeneracy that demands specific treatment approaches
c. Communicates distressing and rageful states of mind

2. Anna Motz says	Select 1 correct answer
a. Women are fundamentally passive
b. Women are governed by maternal instinct
c. Female violence is a response to powerlessness

Dr Adah Sachs
1. Dr Adah Sachs says which of the following?	Select 1 correct answer
a. The question whether persons with DID have agency and capacity has been much debated with regard to their liability to bearing criminal responsibility
b. A person with DID is exempted from criminal responsibility
c. A person with DID is not exempted from criminal responsibility

2. Dr Adah Sachs said which of the following statements?	Tick any that apply
a. “Dissociation ultimately becomes maladaptive.”
b. “Alters are certainly not confused, erratic or �mad�”
c. “Some alters are identified with the abusers and admire their strength, cruelty or high standing within the group. ”

Dr Richard Shuker
1. Richard Shuker says which of the following?	Select 1 correct answer
a. Male prisoners who apply to come into HMP Grendon “Believe in change.”
b. Male prisoners who apply to come into HMP Grendon “Believe in they are trapped in patterns of abuse.”
c. Male prisoners who apply to come into HMP Grendon “Believe in revolution.”

2. Richard Shuker says one of the following	Select 1 correct answer
a. An important principle of a therapeutic community is that it has systems and structures in place which allow for regression
b. An important principle of a therapeutic community is that it has systems and structures in place which allow for leisure activities
c. An important principle of a therapeutic community is that it has systems and structures in place which allow for problem-solving

Dr Celia Taylor
1. Dr Celia Taylor describes common defense mechanisms. Which of the following does she list ?	Tick any that apply
a. Projection
b. Identification
c. The moral defense

2. Dr Celia Taylor refers to 3 central features of severe personality disorder. Which of these does she list?	Tick any that apply
a. Self harm/suicidality
b. internalization of the original abuse as later self-abuse
c. Suspiciousness towards help

Dr Estela Welldon
1. Which of the following statements does Dr Estela Welldon make?	Select 1 correct answer
a. Physical contact must never take place with forensic patients
b. Physical contact can reassure the forensic patient
c. Physical contact has to be carefully evaluated by the therapist to prevent retraumatization

2. Which of the following does Dr Estel Welldon propose?	Select 1 correct answer
a. That the key principles of forensic psychotherapy are acceptance and containment
b. That we must first interpret the transference
c. The first challenge in forensic psychotherapy is to get the patient to express remorse for their crime

Dr Jessica Yakeley
1. Which of the following statements does Dr Jessica Yakeley make?	Tick any that apply
a. Reactive violence triggered by experiences of shame which threatens return of the alien self and collapse of the self
b. Reactive or hostile aggression is performed in response to provocation
c. Violence occurs when there is inhibition of capacity for metallization – metallization protects against violence

2. Dr Jessica Yakeley outlines the aims of the Personality Disordered Offender Pathways Strategy. Which are listed by her?	Tick any that apply
a. Treatment protocols for the containment of arousal and the degree of anger experienced by aggressor
b. Improved risk assessment, sentence planning and case management of offenders in the community
c. New treatment services in prisons and community environments including therapeutic communities

History of Forensic Psychotherapy – PAPER by Alex Goforth
1. During the mid 1960s, a �therapeutic community� was created at the Henderson Hospital for the treatment of severe personality disorders. Who by?	Select 1 correct answer
a. Dr Aubrey Lewis
b. Dr Maxwell Jones
c. David Stafford-Clark

2. The Portman Clinic held a conference in 1961. What was the subject o the event?	Select 1 correct answer
a. Pathology and the treatment of sexual deviation
b. The treatment of personality disorders
c. Trauma and dissociation

Aetiology of Forensic Psychopathology – PAPER by Alex Goforth
1. Which of the following is stated in the paper?	Select 1 correct answer
a. There is a strong causal relationship between mental ill health and sexual offending
b. There is no causal relationship between mental ill health and sexual offending
c. Attempts to understand sexual offending should begin with a focus on biology

2. Which of the following is stated in the paper?	Select 1 correct answer
a. Hudson and Ward (1997) hypothesized that men who have sexually offended against children tend to have anxious, pre-occupied and fearful styles of attachment.
b. Hudson and Ward (1997) suggested that men who have sexually offended against children tend to have avoidant or dismissive styles of attachment.
c. Hudson and Ward (1997) proposed that men who have sexually offended against children tend to have a disorganized attachment style

Forensic psychopathology � a summary of disorders – PAPER
1. Which statement is made in this paper?	Tick any that apply
a. Individuals diagnosed with schizophrenia are no more likely than the rest of the population to commit an offense.
b. Individuals diagnosed with schizophrenia are more likely to be detected and arrested.
c. Individuals diagnosed with schizophrenia are less likely than the general population to commit a violence crime

2. Which statement is made in this paper?	Tick any that apply
a. In a large sample of female shoplifters 34% suffered a depressive disorder
b. In a large sample of female shoplifters 24% suffered from a borderline personality disorder
c. In a large sample of female shoplifters 24% suffered a depressive disorder

The post Forensic Psychotherapy appeared first on Confer US.

Forensic Psychotherapy

admin — Tue, 04 Jun 2019 16:56:15 +0000

	Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Does Not Apply	Agree	Strongly Agree

I can work more effectively with psychotherapy patients who have fears of committing acts of violence and to place those fears into the context of adverse childhood experiences and disturbed attachment relationships

I am able to discuss the effectiveness of psychodynamic psychotherapy in prisons for residents committed of serious sexual violence, and to be able to cite statistics on re-offending as evidence of that effectiveness

I am able to discuss whether the diagnosis of personality disorder relates to the psychological make-up of people convicted of violent offenses

I have increased understanding and ability to describe at least 4 common defense systems that protect the psyche of the violent criminal – such as denial, projective identification, suicidality – and the function of these restricting their capacity for growth via psychological services

I understand and describe the importance of carefully placed boundaries when working with forensic patients, the risk of triggers

I can outline 3 viable forms of self-protection for the therapist

The instructors were skilled, suitably qualified and knowledgeable in delivering the content

Information could be applied to my practice (if applicable)

Information could contribute to achieving personal or professional goals

Cultural, racial, ethnic, socioeconomic, and gender differences were considered

The content was found to be accurate

Did this program enhance your professional expertise?

Would you recommend this program to others?

	Verry Little	Little	Moderate Amount	A Good Deal	A Great Deal

How much did you learn as a result of this CE program?

How useful was the content of this CE program for your practice or other professional development?

Additional comments. (Optional)

The post Forensic Psychotherapy appeared first on Confer US.

Reading List

admin — Fri, 10 May 2019 19:30:06 +0000

Module Speakers

Dr Jamie Bennett

Understanding Prison Staff
Publisher: Willan – 2007

Dictionary of Prisons and Punishment
Publisher: Willan – 2007

Handbook on Prisons
Publisher: Routledge – 2016

Dr Ronald Doctor

Dangerous Patients: A Psychodynamic Approach to Risk Assessment and Management
Publisher: Karnac Books 2003

Murder; a psychotherapeutic investigation
Publisher: Karnac Books 2008

Dr Sandra M Grant

Mutative Metaphors in Psychotherapy: the Aeolian Mode By Murray Cox and Alice Theilgaard London: Tavistock Social Science Paperback.
Publisher: Psychoanalytic Psychotherapy – 1990

Politics and Planning in the National Health Service
Publisher: Open University Press – 1990

Personal Issues Facing the Psychotherapist in the National Health Service
Publisher: Psychoanalytic Psychotherapy – 1986

Professor Brett Kahr

Sex and the Psyche: The Truth About Our Most Secret Fantasies
Publisher: Penguin Books – 2008

D.W. Winnicott: A Biographical Portrait
Publisher: Karnac Books – 1996

The Forensic Psychotherapy Monograph Series

The late Professor Gill McGauley

Forensic Mental Health: Concepts, Systems, and Practice
Publisher: Oxford University Press – 2009

counseling Difficult Clients
Publisher: Sage – 1998

Ms Anna Motz

The Psychology of Female Violence: Crimes Against the Body
Publisher: Routledge – 2008

Managing Self Harm: Psychological Perspectives
Publisher: Routledge – 2009

Toxic Couples: The Psychology of Domestic Violence
Publisher: Routledge – 2008

Dr Adah Sachs

Forensic Aspects of Dissociative Identity Disorder
Publisher: Karnac Books – 2008

Dr Richard Shuker

Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI) Profiles of Offenders and Their Relationship to Institutional Misconduct and Risk of Reconviction
Publisher: PubMed – 2012

The relationship between intellectual ability and the treatment needs of offenders in a therapeutic community prison
Publisher: Journal of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology – 2011

Forensic Therapeutic Communities: A Critique of Treatment Model and Evidence Base
Publisher: The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice – 2010

An assessment of change in negative relating in two male forensic therapy samples using the Person’s Relating to Others Questionnaire (PROQ)
Publisher: Journal of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology – 2009

The Inpatient Treatment of Personality-Disordered Offenders: Multidisciplinary Successes and Tensions
Publisher: International Journal of Applied Psychoanalytic Studies- 2015

The place of psychoanalytic psychotherapy in the treatment of high-risk personality-disordered offenders
Publisher: Psychoanalytic Psychotherapy – 2015

Dr Estela V. Welldon

Playing with Dynamite: A Personal Approach to the Psychoanalytic Understanding of Perversions, Violence, and Criminality
Publisher: Karnac Books – 2011

Mother, Madonna, Whore: The Idealization and Denigration of Motherhood
Publisher: Karnac Books – 1992

Ideas in psychoanalyzis: Sadomasochism
Publisher: Icon Books – 2002

A Practical Guide to Forensic Psychotherapy
Publisher: Jessica Kingsley – 1996

Dr Jessica Yakeley

Learning About Emotions in Illness: Integrating Psychotherapeutic Teaching into Medical Education
Publisher: Routledge – 2015

Working with Violence: A Contemporary Psychoanalytic Approach
Publisher: Palgrave – 2010

Medical Psychotherapy
Publisher: Oxford University Press – 2016

Seminal Papers

admin — Fri, 10 May 2019 19:29:05 +0000

Objective
This study evaluated the effect of mentalization-based treatment by partial hospitalization compared to treatment as usual for borderline personality disorder 8 years after entry into a randomized, controlled trial and 5 years after all mentalization-based treatment was complete.

Conclusions
Patients with 18 months of mentalization-based treatment by partial hospitalization followed by 18 months of maintenance mentalizing group therapy remain better than those receiving treatment as usual, but their general social function remains impaired.

Objective
This randomized controlled trial tested the effectiveness of an 18-month mentalization-based treatment (MBT) approach in an outpatient context against a structured clinical management (SCM) outpatient approach for treatment of borderline personality disorder.

Conclusions
Structured treatments improve outcomes for individuals with borderline personality disorder. A focus on specific psychological processes brings additional benefits to structured clinical support. Mentalization-based treatment is relatively undemanding in terms of training so it may be useful for implementation into general mental health services. Further evaluations by independent research groups are now required.

Abstract
Mental disorders traditionally have been viewed as distinct, episodic, and categorical conditions. This view has been challenged by evidence that many disorders are sequentially comorbid, recurrent/chronic, and exist on a continuum. Using the Dunedin Multidisciplinary Health and Development Study, we examined the structure of psychopathology, taking into account dimensionality, persistence, co-occurrence, and sequential comorbidity of mental disorders across 20 years, from adolescence to midlife. Psychiatric disorders were initially explained by three higher-order factors (Internalizing, Externalizing, and Thought Disorder) but explained even better with one General Psychopathology dimension. We have called this dimension the p factor because it conceptually parallels a familiar dimension in psychological science: the g factor of general intelligence. Higher p scores are associated with more life impairment, greater familiality, worse developmental histories, and more compromised early-life brain function. The p factor explains why it is challenging to find causes, consequences, biomarkers, and treatments with specificity to individual mental disorders. Transdiagnostic approaches may improve research.

Fazel S & Danesh J. 2002. Serious mental disorder in 23000 prisoners: a systematic review of 62 surveys. Lancet 359: 545-50.

Background
About 9 million people are imprisoned worldwide, but the number with serious mental disorders (psychosis, major depression, and antisocial personality disorder) is unknown. We did a systematic review of surveys on such disorders in general prison populations in western countries.

Methods
We searched for psychiatric surveys that were based on interviews of unselected prison populations and included diagnoses of psychotic illnesses or major depression within the previous 6 months, or a history of any personality disorder. We did computer-assisted searches, scanned reference lists, searched journals, and corresponded with authors. We determined prevalence rates of serious mental disorders, sex, type of prisoner (detainee or sentenced inmate), and other characteriztics.

Findings
62 surveys from 12 countries included 22790 prisoners (mean age 29 years, 18530 [81%] men, 2568 [26%] of 9776 were violent offenders). 3.7% of men (95% CI 3.3–4.1) had psychotic illnesses, 10% (9–11) major depression, and 65% (61–68) a personality disorder, including 47% (46–48) with antisocial personality disorder. 4.0% of women (3.2–5.1) had psychotic illnesses, 12% (11–14) major depression, and 42% (38–45) a personality disorder, including 21% (19–23) with antisocial personality disorder. Although there was substantial heterogeneity among studies (especially for antisocial personality disorder), only a small proportion was explained by differences in prevalence rates between detainees and sentenced inmates. Prisoners were several times more likely to have psychosis and major depression, and about ten times more likely to have antisocial personality disorder, than the general population.

Interpretation
Worldwide, several million prisoners probably have serious mental disorders, but how well prison services are addressing these problems is not known.

Fazel, S. & Seewald, K. (2012) Severe mental illness in 33 588 prisoners worldwide: systematic review and meta-regression analysis. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 200 (5) 364-373

Background
High levels of psychiatric morbidity in prisoners have been documented in many countries, but it is not known whether rates of mental illness have been increasing over time or whether the prevalence differs between low-middle-income countries compared with high-income ones.

Aims
To systematically review prevalence studies for psychotic illness and major depression in prisoners, provide summary estimates and investigate sources of heterogeneity between studies using meta-regression.

Method
Studies from 1966 to 2010 were identified using ten bibliographic indexes and reference lists. Inclusion criteria were unselected prison samples and that clinical examination or semi-structured instruments were used to make DSM or ICD diagnoses of the relevant disorders.

Results
We identified 109 samples including 33 588 prisoners in 24 countries. Data were meta-analyzed using random-effects models, and we found a pooled prevalence of psychosis of 3.6% (95% CI 3.1-4.2) in male prisoners and 3.9% (95% CI 2.7-5.0) in female prisoners. There were high levels of heterogeneity, some of which was explained by studies in low-middle-income countries reporting higher prevalences of psychosis (5.5%, 95% CI 4.2-6.8; P = 0.035 on meta-regression). The pooled prevalence of major depression was 10.2% (95% CI 8.8-11.7) in male prisoners and 14.1% (95% CI 10.2-18.1) in female prisoners. The prevalence of these disorders did not appear to be increasing over time, apart from depression in the USA (P = 0.008). Conclusions
High levels of psychiatric morbidity are consistently reported in prisoners from many countries over four decades. Further research is needed to confirm whether higher rates of mental illness are found in low- and middle-income nations, and examine trends over time within nations with large prison populations.

Glasser, M (1996) The Assessment and Management of Dangerousness: The Psychological Contribution. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry. 7: 271-283.

Abstract
In the difficulties in assessing dangerousness, the contribution of the psychoanalytical approach should not be overlooked: it can be of great value in diagnosis, treatment, discharge evaluation and management within an institution and in the community.

Hinshelwood, R.D. (1999) The difficult patient. The role of ‘scientific psychiatry’ in understanding patients with chronic schizophrenia or severe personality disorder. British Journal of Psychiatry. 1999 Mar;174:187-90.

Abstract
The role of ‘scientific psychiatry’ in understanding patients with chronic schizophrenia or sever personality disorder.

Main, T (1957) The Ailment. British Journal of Medical Psychology, 30: 129-145.

Abstract
Address from the Chair, to the Medical Section, British Psychological Society, on 20 March 1957, in which the author offers a psychoanalytic understanding of the dynamics within teams involved in the treatment of individuals on psychiatric inpatient hospital wards.

Mullen, P. E. (2000) Forensic mental health. The British Journal of Psychiatry. 176 (4) 307-311

Abstract
In which the author outlines what Forensic Psychiatry is, and some of the key challenges facing the discipline, such as risk assessment and management, service improvement, and workforce development.

Steadman, H.J., Mulvey, E. P., & Monahan, J. (1998) Violence by People discharged From Acute Psychiatric Inpatient Facilities and by Others in the Same Neighborhoods. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 55(5):393-401.

Background
The public perception that mental disorder is strongly associated with violence drives both legal policy (eg, civil commitment) and social practice (eg, stigma) toward people with mental disorders. This study describes and characterizes the prevalence of community violence in a sample of people discharged from acute psychiatric facilities at 3 sites. At one site, a comparison group of other residents in the same neighborhoods was also assessed.

Methods
We enrollled 1136 male and female patients with mental disorders between the ages of 18 and 40 years in a study that monitored violence to others every 10 weeks during their first year after discharge from the hospital. Patient self-reports were augmented by reports from collateral informants and by police and hospital records. The comparison group consisted of 519 people living in the neighborhoods in which the patients resided after hospital discharge. They were interviewed once about violence in the past 10 weeks.Results
There was no significant difference between the prevalence of violence by patients without symptoms of substance abuse and the prevalence of violence by others living in the same neighborhoods who were also without symptoms of substance abuse. Substance abuse symptoms significantly raised the rate of violence in both the patient and the comparison groups, and a higher portion of patients than of others in their neighborhoods reported symptoms of substance abuse. Violence in both patient and comparison groups was most frequently targeted at family members and friends, and most often took place at home.Conclusions
“discharged mental patients” do not form a homogeneous group in relation to violence in the community. The prevalence of community violence by people discharged from acute psychiatric facilities varies considerably according to diagnosis and, particularly, co-occurring substance abuse diagnosis or symptoms.

The post Seminal Papers appeared first on Confer US.

Aetiology of Forensic Psychopathology

admin — Fri, 10 May 2019 19:27:59 +0000

Aetiology is “the study of the causes of disease.” (Reber and Reber, 2001)

The concept originates in a medical model that looks predominantly at biological factors, for example the genetic basis of bipolar disorder. This is broadened within the psychiatric model to include aspects of the environment, which would include psychological or social factors. There is a risk when employing the medical model of attributing the cause of a mood disorder to biology, rather than recognizing biological factors as contributing to an individual’s affective experience, alongside environmental factors. (Bartlett, 2010)

Spitzer and Wilson (1975) explored whether psychiatric disorders can justifiably be referred to as physiological dysfunction, and concluded that they cannot. Their reasons were: 1) that the aetiology of psychiatric disorders is never fully understood, and they are typically multi-factorial; 2) that features of psychiatric disorders are often part and parcel of normal experience, unlike, for example, ‘coughs’ or ‘heart pain’; 3) that there would need to be a demonstrable physical change in the individual – in fact that there are instances where this is the case, as well as more recent research into genetic pre-disposing factors in personality disorder (Tobena, 2000), and; 4) that physiological dysfunction should proceed independently of environmental influences, which is not the case.

It is important to note that Caspi et al (2014), and Patalay et al (2015) have recently elucidated a general factor for psychopathology (p-factor) in psychiatric disorders onto which all aetiological factors load. Higher p scores have been associated with greater life impairment, greater familiarity, poorer developmental histories and more compromised early brain function. The authors propose that the p-factor explains the challenges of identifying common aetiological factors associated with any specific psychiatric disorders.

In terms of the relationship between psychopathology and offending behavior, the psychodynamic perspective presents with another useful way of thinking:

“At times, the criminal act is the expression of more severe psychopathology; it is secretive, completely encapsulated and split from the rest of the patient’s personality, which acts as a defense against a psychotic illness (Hopper, 1991). On the other hand, it can be a calculated act associated with professional, careerist criminality. The forensic psychotherapist can help to clarify these difficult diagnostic issues. ” (Welldon, 2011: 174)

Welldon (2011) reminds us further on that patients with severe psychopathology have experienced profound instability and inconsistency at crucial junctures in their early lives in which both their psychological and physiological survival were in jeopardy. These experiences have effectively disrupted processes of individuation and separation through undermining the basic trust towards primary caregivers that most people are able to depend on.

This paper will examine the work carried out so far to identify the aetiologies of common forensic psychopathology that manifest specific offending behaviors, considering physiological and environmental factors, and including psychodynamic perspectives.

Violent crimes

Despite the media’s portrayal of mentally ill individuals as the common perpetrators of violent crimes, most individuals with mental illness are not violent, although there is a small but significant association. (Yakeley, 2010)

It is worth bearing in mind Estela Welldon’s (2015) observations, that the common public response to violence is rarely scrutinized as it appears on the surface to be logical and pragmatic. Projection and splitting are usually at play, and as a result perpetrators are labeled ‘bad’, with those looking on defending their ‘goodness’ in contrast, which is an example of Melanie Klein’s (1946) ‘projective identification’. As this approach to understanding the dynamics of violence is often viewed as condoning the criminal act, psychodynamic approaches can be vilified, and as a result the forensic psychotherapist has the invidious task both of trying to help their patient, whilst working through some of the painful problems that wider society contends with.

If we turn to research studies, this is what we find.

Violence in individuals with mental disorder has been correlated with a range of maladjusted behavior during early childhood, which in turn are associated with aetiological factors. (Burke, 2010)

Such maladjusted behaviors include attention and concentration problems, recurrent failure in academic settings, and truancy and expulsion from school (Harris, et al 1993), anti-social behavior at an early age (such as chronic alcohol/substance abuse, and aggressiveness) (Farrington, 2001), impulsive, reckless behavior during adolescence, problems with peer group relationships, and hostility towards authority (Melton et al, 1997).

The aetiological factors associated with these maladaptive behaviors are sexual and physical abuse and neglect (Ferguson and Lynskey, 1997; Weiler and Widom, 1996; Widom, 1989), separation from parents at an early age (under 16 years), parental rejection, low parental involvement, cruel and inconsistent parenting (Muetzell, 1995), parental alcoholism (Moffitt, 1987; Rydelius, 1994; Virkkunen et al 1996) and violence within the family (Blomhoff et al, 1990; Fitch and Papantonio 1983; Johnston 1988; Ryan, 1989).

Burke (2010) stresses that whilst these factors may not directly cause violent behavior, they may “structure potential violence” (41) and they may shape triggers to future violence. Glasser (1996) noted that an individual diagnosed with schizophrenia does not commit a homicidal act as a result of psychological malfunctioning. As Doctor (2008: 2) avers “even the most apparently insane violence has a meaning in the mind of the person who commits it. There is a need to be aware of this meaning and to learn from it in an attempt to prevent further violence.”

If we are thinking less about the root causes, and more about the moment to moment dynamics that precede violent crimes, it is helpful to remember James Gilligan’s assertion that acts of violence, and this is especially true of those acts that appear irrational, are most often preceded by subjective feelings of humiliation. (Gilligan, 1996)

For more detail on the psychodynamics underpinning violent crimes, we have learnt from De Zulueta (2006) what some consider to be a nearly ineluctable process that takes place in between mental and physical pain and its development into physical violence. Where De Zulueta makes reference to individual situations, Meloy and Yakeley (2014) apply a similar approach to the context of group and social violence, including acts of genocide and terrorizm.

Violence towards women

As with any other offending behavior explored here, there is a biological theory underpinning domestic violence against women, which points to men’s average greater size and physical strength. Dobash and Dobash (1992), and Koss et al (1994), note that this implies such incidents have different meanings and physical consequences for the victims. There are also powerful discourses that make aggression, and therefore violence, as naturally masculine behavior, as well a biological sub-plot, which connects levels of testosterone and aggression. (Hearn, 1998)

From a psychological perspective, a commonly attributed cause is problematic personality types, or personality disorders (Dobash et al 2000; Hearn, 1998; Koss et al, 1994), though this has been criticized as withdrawing the agency from such men, which also makes the possibly of them engaging in transformative change of themselves difficult. (Dobash et al, 2000)

Sexual offending

The prevalence of mental ill health amongst sexual offenders is low (10% or less) (Sahota and Chesterman, 1998b), although in the region of 30%-50% for personality disorders. (Ahlmeyer at al, 2003; Madsen et al, 2006) However, there is no causal relationship between mental ill health and sexual offending. Any relationship is complex, and needs to take into account aetiological and risk factors.

It is important to bear in mind that whilst the following characteriztics have been observed in men who’ve committed sexual offenses, they will not be present in all individuals who offend. (Houston, 2010)

As discussed above, early attempts to understand sexual offending began with a focus on biology, such as Goodman’s (1987) theory, which concentrated on hormonal and genetic factors. Elaborating on Marshall’s (1989) observations of an interaction between deficits in the capacity to have intimate relationships, and sexual offending, Marshall and Barbaree (1990) proposed a multifactor ‘integrated’ theory. The theory included genetic factors alongside the influence of the criticial adolescent developmental task in males of distinguishing between aggressive and sexual impulses, as they emanate from the same brain structures. They recognized that hormonal factors will render this task more challenging, especially in the context of unfavorable early development.

Hudson and Ward (1997) hypothesized that men who have sexually offended against children tend to have anxious, pre-occupied and fearful styles of attachment. Attachment theory is the psychological model of the dynamics of human relationships, learnt in early childhood, and articulated especially in times of stress. (Bowlby, 1971) Smallbone (2006) later developed an ‘attachment-theoretical revision’ of the ‘integrated’ theory.

The significance of negative early childhood experiences and their contribution to the development of maladaptive patterns of attachment in later sexual offending has been increasingly examined in the last two decades. Craissati et al (2002) found that the family history of sexual offenders involved high levels of disruption, neglect and violence, and Prentky et al (1989) found a relationship between inconsistency in caregivers, and familial sexual deviation and abuse, with severity of sexual aggression within a cohort of sentenced rapists.

Higher levels of physical abuse have been identified in the family lives of rapists than other sexual offenders (Marshall et al, 1991) or non-sexual offenders (Leonard, 1993). High rates (40%) have been found amongst convicted child abusers (Craisatti and McClurg, 1996).

A history of sexual abuse has consistently been found to be more common in sexual offenders than in either non-sexual offenders or non-offenders. In men who have sexually offended against children, the rates of victimization have been found to be between 46% and 51% (Craissati et al, 2002; Craisatti and McClurg, 1996; Houston and Scoales 2008).

Studies have also examined underlying beliefs and cognitive schema of sexual offenders, for example, the work on cognitive distortions by Abel et al (1989), and implicit theories that underpin these cognitive distortions amongst men who offend against children (Ward and Keenan, 1999), and amongst convicted rapists. (Polaschek and Ward, 2002)

There are various theories that bring these things together, such as Finkelhor’s (1984) model of sexual offending against children, Wolf’s (1985) model of the influence of early childhood adversity leading to sexually deviant interests, and Ward & Siegert’s (2002) aetiological theory of sexual offenders against children, and the heterogeneity amongst them. In addition, models of sexual aggression towards women have been constructed by Hall and Hirschmann (1991), which has been critically evaluated by Ward et al (2006), and Malamuth et al (1993).

The post Aetiology of Forensic Psychopathology appeared first on Confer US.

Forensic psychotherapy – history and theoretical schools of thought

admin — Fri, 10 May 2019 19:26:34 +0000

Forensic psychotherapy “is a bridge between traditional forensic psychiatry with a major focus on diagnosis and risk, and traditional psychotherapy with a focus on understanding why things happen.” (Welldon, 2015b) Williams (1991) examines the difficulties in bridging these disciplines. Eastman (1993: 28) noted that “in a specialty where there is an extraordinary level of psychopathology, as well as of childhood deprivation and abuse, it seems extraordinary that the (forensic) establishment has paid so little attention to the psychopathological understanding and psychotherapy”.

Forensic Psychotherapy seeks to understand the unconscious motivations of the offender’s antisocial behaviors, with the objective of preventing their repetition, which might lead to further crimes against society. The better the criminal mind can be understood, the more effectively positive action can be taken to prevent criminal acts, and the better counter-transferential responses can be understood and managed. The expectation is that in time, this should lead to more effective and economically viable treatments. (Welldon, 1994)

Typically, criminal behavior is responded to with punishment, so a compassionate response that attempts to understand the offender and his delinquent actions in the context of self-destructive and compulsive behaviors is equated with condonement. (Welldon, 2015) As such the Forensic Psychotherapist has the invidious task of both trying to help his/her patient, whilst also trying to work through some of the painful problems that society contends with.

Unlike the dyadic relationship between therapist and patient in traditional psychotherapy, forensic psychotherapy involves a triadic relationship between therapist, patient, and society. (de Smit, 1992) Welldon (2015b) draws other triadic relationships into this work: between the social roles of ‘bully’, ‘victim’ and ‘bystander’ (Twemlow, Sacco and Williams, 1996), and; between the cultures of concern, learning and blaming. (Welldon, 2011)

The modifications of traditional psychoanalytic practice that have led to forensic psychotherapy as a model in its own right have received support from eminent psychoanalyzts such as Kernberg (2014) and Twemlow (2013).

Over the years this approach has made progress, and behaviors traditionally treated as transgressions deserving punishment have been steadily recognized as being understandable, with a basis in the patients life experiences. This is evidenced by the inclusion of such behaviors in the Diagnostic Statistical Manuals, e.g. DSM – III-R ((American Psychiatric Association (APA), 1987).

Fishman and Ruscynski (2004) note that it is due to the work of the International Association of Forensic Psychotherapy and Dr Estela Welldon, that the title of forensic psychotherapist came into existence.

History

The UK has been at the vanguard of the development of forensic psychotherapy, since, in 1931, the Institute for the Scientific Treatment of Delinquency and Crime was established. This later became known as the Institute for the Study and Treatment of Delinquency (ISTD) (Cordess, 1992; Glover, 1960). The Institute identified its goal as to promote alternative and better ways of dealing with criminals than imprisoning them. It also sought to advance understanding of the causes and prevention of crime through scientific research, as well as consolidating the literature already extant, promoting cooperation between the relevant statutory and professional bodies involved in forensic work, and to advise and educate colleagues and the public. Its first chair was the eminent and influential psychoanalyzt Dr Edward Glover.

The ISTD was strongly influenced by the work of the psychiatrist and psychotherapist, Dr Grace Pailthorpe, who worked in Birmingham and Holloway prisons following time as a doctor in the trenches in the First World War. Dr Pailthorpe eventually wrote Studies in the Psychology of Delinquency (1932) in which she explored her interest in the personalities of female prisoners, which attracted other like minded psychoanalyzts, including Dr Glover, who had himself been expanding the literature around sexuality, criminality, and addictions.

Glover wrote in his own history of the ISTD that, as the work dealt with social phenomena, it required the involvement of a variety of disciplines, including social workers and social psychologists, but that the most vital approach to making sense of crime, was psychoanalytic. (Fishman & Ruszcynski, 2004) Welldon (2015) notes that forensic psychotherapy is typically a multi-disciplinary team approach, in recognition of the complex interconnected set of systems through which the forensic patient moves.

Due to the stigma attached to its work, the clinicians of the ISTD were prevented from working under one roof until May 1937. In 1948, with the establishment of the National Health Service, one part of the ISTD joined the NHS as the Portman Clinic, offering treatment primarily, and a part that remained the ISTD (now located at Kings College London) focused on research and training. (Welldon, 1992) In the United States during the early 20th century, Dr Karl Menninger was establishing the Menninger School of Psychiatry in Topeka, Kansas. He believed that punishment protected neither society not the criminal, and went considerably further with a psychodynamic perspective.

Dr Menninger famously critiqued the popular interpretation of Lee Harvey Oswald’s case, as an example of the alienated, little man, gaining attention and notoriety through a transgressive act directed at society (1967).

In the UK, during the mid 1960s, Dr Maxwell Jones founded a “therapeutic community” (Jones, 1953) at the Henderson Hospital for the treatment of severe personality disorders, at the time known in a pejorative sense as psychopaths. This clinic was run in such a way as to achieve greater parity and equality between staff and patients, with patients having a much greater say in the running of the institution, and even the discharge of their peers. In this way Dr Jones further eroded the stigma engrained in the treatment of such individuals.

During the 1960s the Portman Clinic continued to play a central part in the development of the field, holding conferences (in 1961), and publishing volumes (the same year, and a second edition in 1979) on pathology and the treatment of sexual deviation, such as “Sexual Deviation” (Eds Ismond Rosen, 1964)

Fishman & Ruszcynski (2004) note that a number of seminal works emanated from clinicians working within the Portman Clinic. For example “From the analysis of a transvestite” (1979a), and “On violence: a preliminary communication” (1998) by Dr Mervin Glasser, “Clinical types of homosexuality” (1989c) and “A re-evaluation of acting out in relation to working through” (1966) by Adam Limentani and Estela Welldon’s work on female perversion “Mother, Madonna, Whore” (1988). Another key publication is the twin volume edition “Forensic Psychotherapy” edited by Christopher Cordess and Murray Cox.

Having been embedded within the fabric of the NHS for some years, and established a theoretical basis, the place of forensic psychotherapy within statutory services in the UK was at risk during the mid 1980s, due to a serious review of the role of psychotherapeutic work offered through the NHS. However, the Seymour review (1985) ultimately concluded that psychotherapy did have a part to play in the NHS.

Founding of the IAFP

A pivotal moment in the recognition of forensic psychotherapy as a discipline in it’s own right, was the initiation of the International Association of Forensic Psychotherapy (IAFP). As an idea, the IAFP emerged from a conference on Law & Psychotherapy in Leuven, Belgium, in 1991.

At this time, the gap between the psychodynamic and judicial understandings of criminal behavior was being bridged through residential weekends for judges, co-led by staff from the Portman Clinic, to enable them to become familiar with a psychodynamic understanding of unconscious motivations of offenders. (Welldon, 2015b)

The IAFP emerged, driven by Dr Welldon, from the European symposia, originating in the 1980s with annual meetings at the Portman Clinic that brought together practitioners from Holland, Belgium, Austria and Germany, along with staff from the Portman Clinic, to explore work with patients involved with the criminal justice system due to their psychopathology.

The IAFP is a robust enterprise, which marked its 25th anniversary in 2016, with its 25th annual conference in Ghent, Belgium.

Training in Forensic Psychotherapy

The most important contribution to the field emerged from the Portman’s array of workshops and conferences was the 2 year Diploma in Forensic Psychotherapeutic Studies, sponsored first by the British Post Graduate Medical Federation, and later by UCL. The course was pioneered by Dr Estela Welldon, who was appointed as clinical tutor at the Portman Clinic in 1988. Dr Welldon and Professor Michael Peckham structured the course, with a faculty of Portman Clinic staff, and other consultants delivering the teaching. The course was the first of its kind, and ran for 4 years and was the embodiment of the challenges of bridging the disciplines of forensic psychiatry, and of psychodynamic psychotherapy. In this respect, it played a crucial role in furthering understanding of the field, and creating a cohort of newly equipped clinicians, in this “evolving species”. (Adshead, 1991).

Many of the alumni have become influential figures in the sector and held leading offices within the IAFP, and since the course was multidisciplinary, books from a broad range of different professions continue to emerge, illuminating and widening the scope of this field.

These books include Toxic Couples: The Psychology of Domestic Violence (2014) and The Psychology of Female Violence: Crimes Against the Body (2008) by Anna Motz, and Dangerous Patients: A Psychodynamic Approach to Risk Assessment and Management (2003) and Murder: A Psychotherapeutic Investigation (2008) by Ronald Doctor.

The first consultant psychiatry post in forensic psychotherapy was created in 1994 by Professor Eastman and Margaret Orr, then medical director at Broadmoor Prison, which was held by Dr Gill McGauley. (McGauley, 2016)

Forensic psychotherapy is being adapted for a variety of purposes, for example, working with offenders with learning difficulties (Corbett, 2014; Sinason, 2010; Curen & Sinason, 2010), music therapy and art therapy have been shown to be effective for patients in prisons and other secure settings (Compton Dickinson, Odell-Miller, & Adlam, 2012). Group analysis has also been utilized effectively with forensic patients. (Welldon, 1993)

Despite a growing body of evidence for both the effectiveness of these treatments, and the cost-effectiveness of such an approach in comparison to penitentiary and other traditional responses to crime, there are still those who question it’s efficacy. (Altshul, 2013)

The post Forensic psychotherapy – history and theoretical schools of thought appeared first on Confer US.

Treatment approaches to forensic psychopathology – psychodynamic, CBT

admin — Fri, 10 May 2019 19:25:08 +0000

Estela Welldon (1993) states simply that whilst society strongly supports the treatment of victims, the same does not apply to offenders.

In the Mikado, the librettist W. S. Gilbert coined the phrase “let the punishment fit the crime”, which Dr Estela Welldon transposed to “let the treatment fit the crime”. This latter approach is axiomatic of an evidence-based paradigm, which will guide the discussion of treatment approaches for this paper, though will not exclude those treatments where an evidence base is still being assembled.

In terms of the availability of treatment for offenders, a recent report by the center for Mental Health (Durcan, 2016) has found that only a few prisons are able to offer psychological therapies, and that primary mental health care is the weakest element for inmates needing mental health support.

In a systematic review of psychotherapeutic approaches for forensic and clinical cases, Ross et al (2013) identified cognitive behavioral treatments as the dominant paradigm for the rehabilitation of offenders, and a meta-analysis of cognitive behavioral approaches by Landenberger and Lipsey (2005) concluded that such an approach is most effective with higher risk individuals.

Eastman (1993: 28) noted that “in a specialty where there is an extraordinary level of psychopathology, as well as of childhood deprivation and abuse, it seems extraordinary that the (forensic) establishment has paid so little attention to the psychopathological understanding and psychotherapy”. Fortunately, much work has been done since then to elucidate a broad array of aspects of clinical treatment of offenders from a psychodynamic perspective, and this will be explored further down. Welldon (1988, 2011), Cordess & Cox (1996), Welldon & Van Velsen (1997), van Marle (1997).

We will begin by exploring the treatment settings, and continue on to common treatments and interventions. When considering treatment approaches, the setting is crucial, (Taylor, 1997) as it will delimit the range of treatments available. In turn patients may have self-referred, as yet undetected and be seen in an outpatient unit, or they may be in the process of being charged, or they may already be in custody.

Treatment settings

Special hospitals are the most secure settings in the UK, and take the most serious offenders, considered to pose a serious threat to the public. Nursing staff are trained in control and restraint, as well as dealing with high-risk incidents such as hostage-taking. Such hospitals may focus on treating specific disorders. Broadmoor High-Security Hospital, for example, treats substance misuse, and young offenders with psychopathy.

Medium secure units are locked, and self-contained buildings, with some internal security, and no perimeter wall. They would take prisoners who are ready for rehabilitation, or conversely, patients from psychiatric wards or prisons displaying levels of violence in the context of their illness that additional security is indicated. As security is lower, and with sufficient determination, there is some risk of absconscion, as once well and trusted enough they may be allowed leave (either escorted or unescorted).

Such units can vary in size from between 15 to 60 beds. They usually offer treatment to psychotic patients, as patients with a personality disorder are considered more difficult to treat. The size of the units limits the range of treatment offered, which would preclude occupational therapies. Once discharged, a patient would be offered outpatient follow-up, social work supervision (though these may be mandatory if discharge is conditional and a restriction order is in place) and support from a community psychiatric nursing service.

Locked wards and specialized intensive care units within general hospital psychiatric units are suited to managing patients with challenging behavior. These are not ideal for long admissions, as they often do not have outdoor or day areas. However, they are usually more accessible for visiting partners and family.

There are also a handful of specializt services, such as the Portman Clinic, which offers outpatient psychotherapy for patients with sexually related issues, and the Henderson Hospital, which is an inpatient unit for treatment of personality disordered men and women on a voluntary basis.

Treatments and interventions

Cognitive behavioral Therapy

Cognitive behavioral Therapy (CBT) is “designed to help the patient test certain maladaptive cognitions and assumptions” (Beck 1979), and is the dominant form of treatment in the rehabilitation of offenders. (Polaschek, Wilson, Townsend, & Daly, 2005)

Landenberger and Lipsey (2005) carried out a meta-analysis of cognitive behavioral approaches which employed elements of problem solving, victim impact/ empathy, anger control, and behavior modification, and found them to be most effective with higher risk cases.

Specifically, CBT has been used with men who are violent towards intimate female partners, accessed either through self-referral, or through a court order. CBT attempts to change how these men view their violence, and how they manage their behavior. However a Cochrane Review of the RCTs conducted in this area found that the data available was inconclusive in demonstrating any significant effect of the treatment. (Smedslund, et al, 2007)

Ross et al (2013) conducted a systematic review of the efficacy of a range of psychotherapeutic interventions for forensic and clinical cases. The 8 of 10 studies utilizing a CBT model demonstrated reductions in aggression following CBT, however, the data was often not robust and the reductions were not found to be obdurate on follow-up. The results are also not entirely comparable as whilst most of the studies used a CBT framework, they differed in terms of delivery, some favoring individual, others group, and some a blend of the two. The treatment programs also varied, from standard CBT, to inclusion of components of interpersonal therapy and motivational interviewing, and drama therapy. However, it was noted that other factors associated with criminal behavior, such as problematic drinking, social functioning, and beliefs about others, did appear to be reduced. The authors also hypothesize about whether the variety of settings in which forensic patients are treated might have lead to adaptations, which is yet another confounding factor in the review.

Treatments for Personality Disorder

Approximately 5% of the population has a personality disorder (Singleton, et al, 2001). Amongst offenders this rate increases dramatically with 66% in the prison population (Singleton, et al, 1998), and there are indications that the rate is 50% in probation caseloads. (center for Mental Health, 2012) The Bradley Report (2009) recognized the need for significant intervention in this area.

Common treatments for personality disorders include Mentalization Based Therapy (MBT), Structured Clinical Management, and Dialectical behavior Therapy (DBT).

Mentalization Based Therapy

MBT is a treatment commonly offered to violent offenders, particularly those with diagnoses of anti-social and borderline personality disorder. It focuses on improving control over behavior and emotions, improving relationships, and working towards life goals by addressing attachment difficulties, and, through mentalization. Mentalization is an approach to developing our understanding of our own and others mental states, and the interpretation of our own and others actions. Mentalizaion can be seriously disrupted in individuals whose upbringings have been characterized by violent and abusive parenting, that itself lacks mentalization. (McGauley’s Inaugural Lecture, 2016) The effectiveness of this treatment is being studied currently in a nationwide RCT led by Peter Fonagy, Antony Bateman, and Jessica Yakeley. There is already evidence that it improves outcomes and compares well with other interventions (Bateman & Fonagy, 2009), and that improvements are lasting. (Bateman & Fonagy, 2008)

Structured Clinical Management

SCM has also been developed by Bateman, Fonagy, and others, and includes regularly counseling, practical support, advocacy and case management. It ahs also been shown to be effective. (Bateman & Fonagy, 2009)

Dialectical behavior Therapy

DBT is an offshoot of CBT. (Dimeff & Linehan, 2001) The treatment is designed to reduce unwanted behaviors and improve emotional regulation. The development of mindfulness, founded on Buddhist meditation, is a core element, and there is a burgeoning evidence base for its effectiveness. (Feigenbaum, 2007; Verheul, R, et al, 2003))

Other approaches

Ross et al (2013) note that other forms of intervention are being trialed, for example, “Silence the Violence”, a behavioral program described by Minnaar (2010), being tested in South Africa and the UK which operates on vicarious modeling behavior. Other documented treatment programs include ‘collective efficacy’ (Sabol, Coulton, & Kolbin, 2004), Aggression Replacement Therapy (Hornsveld, Nijman, Hollin, & Kraaimaat, 2007), and Social Activity Therapy (Blacker, Watson, & Beech, 2008). These are predominantly founded on behavioral or cognitive behavioral principles, though differ in delivery and structure.

Psychodynamic approach

“Forensic psychotherapists not only provide treatment but also apply psychodynamic thinking to the complexities and dynamics within staff teams and institutions treating this patient group.” (McGauley, 2002: 118)

Forensic psychotherapy is typically a multi-disciplinary team approach, that requires collegiate working between the psychotherapist (s), psychiatry, psychology, nursing, social work or creative arts, as well as other helpers, such as managers and administrators. (Welldon, 2015) This is in recognition of the complex interconnected set of systems through which the forensic patient moves. Most patients are treated with a combination of medication, CBT and group or individual psychodynamic work.

Individual and group psychodynamic forensic psychotherapy is increasingly available across a range of settings, but usually with little capacity, meaning only a very few of the patients who would benefit from it, receive it. (McGauley, 2002: 118)

Many authors have described their psychotherapeutic work with both men and women within prison and maximum-security units. Aiyegbusi & Kelly (2012) explore the technical challenges of working within boundaries in the forensic space, with individuals whose psychopathologies often hinge on transgressions of societal laws, organizational rules, and other’s people’s bodies and lives, which are re-enactments of violations they themselves have suffered. Kelly (2012) explores the boundary challenges of psychotherapeutic work with men who have sexually offended. Moore and Ramsden (2012) elucidate the inherent challenges of working in psychotherapeutic groups with male offenders who have histories of boundary violations whilst in detention. Guanieri (2012) explores how dramatherapy enables creative therapeutic work with individuals using non-verbal and verbal articulations of internal boundary confusion. Dickinson and Benn (2012) look at boundary issues in delivering music therapy in high security settings, and Bownas (2012) investigates boundary characteriztics of family therapy in secure inpatient units. The milieu therapy reviewed by Wolf (1977) that is a characteriztic of inpatient settings, that brings together containment, structure, involvement with a focus on practical matters can be beneficial to those who’ve experienced chaotic lives.

The Assessment

Any forensic intervention should begin with a comprehensive assessment of the patient that is clearly demarcated from the legaliztic encounters the patient may be familiar with. It should explore developmental and family history, alongside their and context and circumstances, and will likely reveal to the psychotherapist some of what may make an offender suitable for treatment, as well as clues to early traumatic experiences. (Welldon, 1993) Assessments should be approached with the utmost honesty and transparency, which extends to the ‘structuring of time” (Cox, 1978).

Selection criteria for psychodynamic treatment

Not all offenders warrant treatment, not all want treatment, and not all can benefit from it. This may be due to careerist criminality. Obversely, the clumsily executed criminal act has become the equivalent of the neurotic symptom that emerges from the unconscious as a flag to a psychopathology needing treatment. (Welldon, 2015)

Exploring the particular psychopathologies can assist with determining whether individual or group psychotherapy will be most effective. For example, an individual with a serious personality disorder, who is unlikely to develop relationships, will not be a good candidate for group psychotherapy. (Welldon, 1993)

Individual psychodynamic treatment

The forensic psychotherapist seeks to help individuals understand their own minds better, and through this to develop a capacity to tolerate their own unpalatable thoughts and emotional states, rather than acting on them. (McGauley, 2002)

Typically treatment is over months, and sometimes years. However, this continuity that is key to a psychodynamic approach can be disrupted due to individuals being moved into different institutions depending on the status of the judiciary proceedings against them. (McGauley, 2002)

There are various characteriztics that indicate an individual can make good use of individual psychotherapy. For instance, patients who’ve experienced a very close, merged relationship with one parent usually benefit from the warmer, less threatening atmosphere in a group. (Welldon, 1993)

Group therapy

Violent offenders tend to benefit more from group psychotherapy, due to the mechanism of identification with others, which, as Freud (1921) observed, tends to limit aggression towards them. Being surrounded by others who can sense hostility welling up before it is articulated gives a group the capacity to confront and defuse violent behavior before it is enacted, and the multiplicity of the transference diversifies and softens the anger which would otherwise have focused intensely on a single target. (Welldon, 1993)

There are also those whose present circumstances preclude them from making good use of group therapy, for example, for those whose own or spouses criminal activities continue, where the rule of confidentiality would be impossible to uphold.

Group-analytic therapy is also indicated for those patients who’ve experienced abuse, both abusers and abused, since the group functions to re-create the family constellation, the violent and anti-social nature of which is at the root of many of their problems. The group setting is also a bulwark against the secrecy that has often perpetuated incestuous relations in the family, as well as the therapists being drawn into a transferential-counter-transferential dynamic that recapitulates the original traumatic experience. (Welldon, 1993)

The post Treatment approaches to forensic psychopathology – psychodynamic, CBT appeared first on Confer US.

Forensic psychopathology – a summary of disorders, e.g. personal disorder, psychopathy

admin — Fri, 10 May 2019 19:24:05 +0000

Numerous studies have indicated a higher prevalence’s of psychiatric disorders in prisoners than in the general population. (Hollin, 1989; Singleton et al, 1998; Singleton et al, 1999; Fazel & Danesh, 2002)

However, it is a common misconception that mental illness and offending behavior are closely related. (Gunn, 1977). Higgins (1995) cautions that the relationship between mental ill health and offending behavior is complex, and can be oversimplified. “Even severe psychopathology, for which treatment in hospital may be advised, will rarely provide a complete explanation for the offending behavior.” (ibid: 53)

A study of 3,142 prisoners in England ands Wales by the ONS exploring the prevalence of 5 psychiatric disorders (psychosis, neurosis, personality disorder, hazardous drinking and drug dependence) found ‘probable psychosis’ in amongst 4% of sentenced male prisoners and 9% of male prisoners on remand. In females these rates increased to 10% and 21% respectively. The prevalence’s of ‘neurotic disorders’ (which includes phobias, panic and anxiety disorders, depression, OCD and PTSD) were higher, in females 76% of those on remand and 63% of those sentenced, and for males 59% and 40% respectively. (Singleton et al, 1998)

In a meta-analytic study of 109 samples including 33, 588 prisoners in 24 countries Fazel & Seewald (2012) found a prevalence of psychosis of 3.6% in male prisoners and 3.9% in female prisoners, which increased to 5.5% in low-middle income countries. The prevalence of major depression was 10.2% in male prisoners and 14.1% in female prisoners.

Although it is typical to think in terms of diagnoses, Yakeley (2010) proposes that “psychological theories of mind linking personality with mental illness” (ibid, pp.28) could have more explanatory power than diagnostic classifications based on epidemiological research and empirical observation, in seeking the root causes of offending behavior. The forensic patient can have psychopathology ranging from dementia to overt psychosis, including psychopathic personality. (Welldon, 1997)

What follows is structured in diagnostic categories.

Common disorders in forensic populations

Schizophrenia

“Schizophrenia is characterized by delusions, hallucinations, disorganized speech and behavior, and other symptoms that cause social or occupational dysfunction. For a diagnosis, symptoms must have been present for six months and include at least one month of active symptoms.”

American Psychiatric Association, DSM V (2013)

Singleton, et al (1998) found that of a sample of prisoners in England and Wales, diagnosed through clinical interviews, 2% of males on remand, 1% of males sentenced, and 3% of female prisoners indicated schizophrenia. Taylor & Gunn (1984) found 6.1% of male prisoners had a diagnosis of schizophrenia.

Individuals diagnosed with schizophrenia are no more likely than the rest of the population to commit an offense (Lindqvist & Allebeck, 1990). However, they are more likely to be detected and arrested (Robertson, 1988), and they are more likely to have committed a violent offense. (Zitrin et al, 1976; Humphreys et al, 1992; Noble & Rodger, 1989; Taylor & Gunn, 1984; Taylor et al , 1994; Link & Stueve, 1994; Hodgins, 1992; Eronen et al, 1996; Wallace et al, 1998) Swanson et al (1996) identified command hallucinations, delusions of thoughts-insertion, or of the individual’s mind being controlled by an external entity as linked to greater risk of aggression.

Individuals diagnosed with schizophrenia who offend fall into two broad categories. The first category includes acutely ill patients with positive symptoms, who are responding to a delusional idea, and the connection between the abnormal mental experience and the offending behavior is usually clear. The second category of patients includes some less prominent positive features, alongside the negative symptoms which have emerged during the course of chronic illness. In these cases the offense is committed unintentionally, out of necessity to achieve survival, admission to hospital or prison, or prevent admission to hospital. (Higgins, 1995)

Depression

There is a broad range of depressive disorders.

“The common feature of all of these disorders is the presence of sad, empty, or irritable mood, accompanied by somatic and cognitive changes that significantly affect the individual’s capacity to function. What differs among them are issues of duration, timing, or presumed etiology.”

American Psychiatric Association, DSM V (2013)

Depression does not present often in violent forensic populations. One in six individuals diagnosed as manic-depressive commit suicide, and violence towards others is much rarer, around 6 in 100,000 (Hafner & Boker, 1982). Violence towards others is usually constrained to close family members, and emanates from psychotic depression with delusional ideas. (Higgins, 1995)

Shoplifting is associated with depression. In a large sample of female shoplifters, 5% needed psychiatric treatment, 24% suffered a depressive disorder and 2% had manic-depression. However, the picture is likely to be more complicated; Gudjonsson (1990) found that psychologically disturbed shoplifters often present comorbidities.

Learning Disability

Whilst it is unusual for individuals with profound, severe or moderate learning disability to be within the forensic population, there are characteriztics of having a mild learning disability which, when coupled with diminished or lacking protective factors, or with unexpected adverse life events, can result in offending behavior. According to the UK Department of Education learning difficulties could include any of the following specific learning disabilities or dyslexia, dyspraxia, speech, language and communication problems, sensory impairments, attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), and autism spectrum disorder (ASD). In the UK the rate of intellectual impairment amongst offenders is higher when both intellectual disability and learning difficulties are present (at between 20-30%) (Talbot, 2008) than in the general population – 2% with intellectual disability (Loucks, 2007) and IQ lower than 85 (17%). However, it also true that unless the offending behavior is especially serious, those with moderate to severe intellectual disability are rarely dealt with through the criminal; justice system. (RCPsych, 2014)

Substance misuse (alcohol, drugs)

There are marked relationships between drug and alcohol abuse, although these are not causal as a number of other factors also contribute, for example, personality characteriztics, social and family background, etc. Alcohol and drug use and dependency does produce effects that make offending more likely, especially violent behavior (Steadman et al, 1998). However, it is often the case that individuals have offended prior to drug or alcohol abuse. (Higgins, 1995)

Alcohol misuse is present in a significant number of the perpetrators of rape (34-72%), in child sexual offenses (49%) and in instances of abuse and neglect within families (Wolfgang & Strohm, 1956; Rada, 1976; Coid, 1986).

Drug-dependence and habitual criminality are often in close association. (Gordon, 1990) As in the case of alcohol misuse, a history of offending usually predates drug-related offending.

Sexual offending

In England and Wales, the numbers of offenders in custody for sexual offenses has increased from 9% in 2005 to 14% in 2013. In 2011, 42% of prisoners sentenced for sexual offenses had committed ‘other sexual offenses’, which includes sexual activity with minors (excluding rape and sexual assaults), exposure, voyeurism etc.

In a study exploring the psychopathology of sex offenders in Colorado in comparison to general inmates, Ahlmeyer, et al (2003) found that sex offenders displayed characteriztics in keeping with schizoid, avoidant, depressive, dependent, self-defeating, and schizotypal personality disorders, alongside anxiety, dysthymia, PTSD, and major depression.

Disorders of Personality

Individuals with disorders of personality make up a high proportion of patients seen in forensic settings. Singleton, et al (1998) found that of a sample of prisoners in England and Wales, diagnosed through clinical interviews, 78% of males on remand, 64% of males sentenced, and 50% of female prisoners manifested a personality disorder. In all three groups, antisocial personality disorder was most common (63%, 49% and 31% respectively). Such rates have not been found in other studies. Taylor & Gunn (1984) found 13.8% of male prisoners had a personality disorder.

Antisocial personality disorder

“APD (Antisocial Personality Disorder) is a diagnosis assigned to individuals who habitually violate the rights of others without remorse.”

American Psychiatric Association, DSM V (2013)

Personality traits such as “immaturity”, “inadequacy”, “hostility and aggression”, and “abnormal sexuality” are commonly associated with anti social personality disorder. (Higgins, 1995)

Higgins (1995) makes clear that, in a clinical sense, antisocial personality disorder is the modern form of now anachronistic terms ‘psychopathic’ or ‘psychopath’, which implies in its perjorative sense, that a patient is untreatable, is used to reject patients from hospital, and applied casually to those with other psychiatric disorders, such as schizophrenia, or hypomania. (Coid, 1988) However, the term is likely to remain in use as it is enshrined in the Mental Health Act (1983) applying to “a persistent disorder or disability of mind [�] which results in abnormally aggressive or seriously irresponsible conduct on the part of the person concerned.” (ibid, Section 1(2)). In a similar way, there is much to be desired in the clarity of the concepts of personality disorder. (Dolan & Coid, 1993; Coid, 1992)

Borderline Personality disorder

“A pervasive pattern of instability of interpersonal relationships, self-image, and affects, and marked impulsivity, beginning in early adulthood and present in a variety of contexts.”

American Psychiatric Association, DSM V (2013)

This is a term that has evolved jointly through psychoanalyzis and hospital psychiatry, and has been useful to describe a set of individuals with impaired sense of self-worth, who tend of develop damaged and volatile relationships. (Higgins, 1995) Such individuals tend to exhibit behaviors that are impulsive, destructive and self-destructive, and experience periods of despair, and anomie, and sometimes brief psychotic episodes. (Jackson & Tarnopolsky, 1990) Such people are capable of serious offenses including sexual offenses and arson, and when in prison or hospital of serious self-harm and arson. Treatment has a reputation for being challenging. The different approaches have been explored by Tantam & Whittaker (1992)

The post Forensic psychopathology – a summary of disorders, e.g. personal disorder, psychopathy appeared first on Confer US.

Forensic Archives - Confer US

Forensic Psychotherapy

Dr Jamie Bennett

Dr Ronald Doctor

Dr Sandra Grant

Mary Haley

Professor Brett Kahr

Professor Gill McGauley

Anna Motz

Dr Adah Sachs

Dr Richard Shuker

Dr Celia Taylor

Dr Estela Welldon

Dr Jessica Yakeley

History of Forensic Psychotherapy - PAPER by Alex Goforth

Aetiology of Forensic Psychopathology - PAPER by Alex Goforth

Forensic psychopathology – a summary of disorders - PAPER

Dr Jamie Bennett

Dr Ronald Doctor

Dr Sandra M Grant

Mary Haley

Professor Brett Kahr

Professor Gill McGauley

Anna Motz

Dr Adah Sachs

Dr Richard Shuker

Dr Celia Taylor

Dr Estela Welldon

Dr Jessica Yakeley

History of Forensic Psychotherapy – PAPER by Alex Goforth

Aetiology of Forensic Psychopathology – PAPER by Alex Goforth

Forensic psychopathology � a summary of disorders – PAPER

Forensic Psychotherapy

Reading List

Seminal Papers

Aetiology of Forensic Psychopathology

Forensic psychotherapy – history and theoretical schools of thought

Treatment approaches to forensic psychopathology – psychodynamic, CBT

Forensic psychopathology – a summary of disorders, e.g. personal disorder, psychopathy